Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations
Created by: Jan Gutteling
Description: This research examines cultural differences in negotiators' responses to persuasive arguments in crisis (hostage) negotiations over time. Using a new method of examining cue-response patterns, the authors examined 25 crisis negotiations in which police negotiators interacted with perpetrators from low-context (LC) or high-context (HC) cultures. Compared with HC perpetrators, LC perpetrators were found to use more persuasive arguments, to reciprocate persuasive arguments in the second half of negotiations, and to respond to persuasive arguments in a compromising way. Further analyses found that LC perpetrators were more likely to communicate threats, especially in the first half of the negotiations, but that HC perpetrators were more likely to reciprocate them. The implications of these findings for our understanding of intercultural interaction are discussed.
Related resources
cultural differences
influence tactics
proximity coefficient
hostage negotiation
Select ]
iCRiSP Research theme: Conflict and crisis management Select ]
Research topic
Created: 16 Feb 2011 by admin
Last modified: 25 Oct 2011 by jangutteling