Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations
Aggregation
Created by: Jan Gutteling
Description: This research examines cultural differences in negotiators' responses to persuasive arguments in crisis (hostage) negotiations over time. Using a new method of examining cue-response patterns, the authors examined 25 crisis negotiations in which police negotiators interacted with perpetrators from low-context (LC) or high-context (HC) cultures. Compared with HC perpetrators, LC perpetrators were found to use more persuasive arguments, to reciprocate persuasive arguments in the second half of negotiations, and to respond to persuasive arguments in a compromising way. Further analyses found that LC perpetrators were more likely to communicate threats, especially in the first half of the negotiations, but that HC perpetrators were more likely to reciprocate them. The implications of these findings for our understanding of intercultural interaction are discussed.
Related resources
Documents
Beune, Giebels, Taylor. Patterns of Interaction in Police Interviews
Published in: Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2010 37 (8), 904-925.

doi: 10.1177/0093854810369623
Select | View ]
Article
Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations: persuasive arguments and cultural differences Select | View ]
Article
Created: 16 Feb 2011 by admin
Last modified: 25 Oct 2011 by jangutteling