Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations
Aggregation
Created by: Jan Gutteling
Description: This research examines cultural differences in negotiators' responses to persuasive arguments in crisis (hostage) negotiations over time. Using a new method of examining cue-response patterns, the authors examined 25 crisis negotiations in which police negotiators interacted with perpetrators from low-context (LC) or high-context (HC) cultures. Compared with HC perpetrators, LC perpetrators were found to use more persuasive arguments, to reciprocate persuasive arguments in the second half of negotiations, and to respond to persuasive arguments in a compromising way. Further analyses found that LC perpetrators were more likely to communicate threats, especially in the first half of the negotiations, but that HC perpetrators were more likely to reciprocate them. The implications of these findings for our understanding of intercultural interaction are discussed.
Related resources
Filter: All - Documents - Organizations - Persons - Relation annotations - Topics
Organizations
centre for Conflict, Risk, and Safety Perception (iCRiSP) Select | View ]
Research group
Lancaster University, Department of Psychology Select | View ]
Department
University of Twente, Department Conflict, Risk, and Safety Select | View ]
Department
Created: 16 Feb 2011 by admin
Last modified: 25 Oct 2011 by jangutteling